Lawmakers Back Defense Export Fund as Existing Financing Hits Limits

[Working National Assembly ProAssembly] <4> Defense Industry - Reps. Kim Byung-joo and Yu Yong-won Consensus on Need for Export-Dedicated Fund

Politics|
|
By Ma Ga-yeon
||
Rep. Kim Byung-joo of the Democratic Party (right) speaks with Rep. Yoo Yong-weon of the People Power Party. Reporter Sung Hyung-joo - Seoul Economic Daily Politics News from South Korea
Rep. Kim Byung-joo of the Democratic Party (right) speaks with Rep. Yoo Yong-weon of the People Power Party. Reporter Sung Hyung-joo

Rep. Kim Byung-joo of the Democratic Party of Korea and Rep. Yu Yong-won of the People Power Party agreed on the need to establish a dedicated fund for defense exports, saying that securing "financing competitiveness" is essential to expanding K-defense exports. They share the view that the existing export financing system has clear limitations amid a continuing stream of large-scale orders.

"For K-defense to keep growing, financing competitiveness must follow alongside weapons competitiveness," Kim stressed. He pointed out that "in 2022, Korea signed major first-round contracts with Poland for K2 tanks, K9 self-propelled howitzers, FA-50 light attack aircraft and Chunmoo multiple rocket launchers, but during the follow-up contract process, export financing limits acted as a stumbling block." His explanation is that the Export-Import Bank of Korea's lending caps for a single borrower and a single country affected the pace of second-round contracts.

Kim proposed that, given the defense industry's characteristic of large-scale contracts, a separate export-dedicated fund should be created. "Mega-contracts that the Export-Import Bank and the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation alone cannot handle could increase further going forward," he said. "Creating a public-private partnership fund or a special fund to provide support could resolve these problems."

Yu also concurred on the need to create an export-dedicated fund. He assessed that "the 2024 revision of the Export-Import Bank of Korea Act raised the statutory capital ceiling to 25 trillion won, but it was a stopgap measure that only put out the immediate fire." He added, "The Canadian submarine project reaches 60 trillion won in scale when maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) costs are included, and projects worth more than 10 trillion won are also waiting in the Middle East." He emphasized that "since the existing revision alone is difficult to handle, institutional supplementary measures are needed."

He also expressed an intention to work toward the passage of related bills already proposed in the National Assembly. "Public hearings and other procedures are also under way," Yu said. "We will actively cooperate and provide support."

Original reporting by Ma Ga-yeon for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Company Atlas

Preview
Market Ontology · The Feedback LoopKFTC 2025 · 92 groups · 121,954 articles

An English ontology of the Korean market — how companies, the media, the government and the National Assembly move each other in a loop. Korea's named controlling persons and designated business groups are a mechanism, not a risk to be priced blind.

SIGNAL

Pre-register
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

Pre-register for SIGNAL English Edition — a premium subscription bringing Korean capital markets coverage (M&A, IPOs, private equity, fund flows) to global institutional investors. First access to the 50% introductory rate.