Fintech: Time to Accelerate Regulatory Innovation

Kim Jong-hyun, Chairman of the Korea FinTech Industry Association

Opinion|
|
By Seoul Economic Daily (Commentary)
||
Kim Jong-hyun, Chairman of the Korea Fintech Industry Association / CEO of Coocon - Seoul Economic Daily Opinion News from South Korea
Kim Jong-hyun, Chairman of the Korea Fintech Industry Association / CEO of Coocon

The landscape of global financial markets is changing at its roots. As the boundaries of the financial industry collapse around artificial intelligence (AI), data, and digital assets, the stage for competition among nations is also shifting rapidly. Now, whether a country possesses superior technology matters just as much as whether it has built an environment where that technology can be realized and spread in the market quickly. An era has arrived in which the institutions and regulatory frameworks that support the speed of innovation form the backbone of a nation's financial competitiveness.

From this perspective, Korea's fintech industry carries both great expectations and new challenges at the same time. Our fintech industry has grown sharply on the foundation of world-class information technology (IT) infrastructure, breathing new vitality into the financial market. Bold policy support led by the government—including the financial regulatory sandbox, the innovative financial services designation system, and the introduction of open banking and MyData—played a substantial role as a catalyst.

But concerns deepen now that the industry has entered the gateway to a "second growth phase." This is because maintaining the methods and regulatory framework that succeeded in the past, on their own, makes it difficult to guarantee a leap and innovation to the next stage. Although financial authorities are making multifaceted efforts toward regulatory innovation, structural limitations exist that prevent the existing institutional framework from fully keeping pace with the rapidly changing field. The time lag that arises in this process can become a heavy burden on a growing industry.

The most representative example is the use of AI in finance. Recently, global financial firms have been evolving at a frightening speed, unveiling customized customer services using generative AI. Authorities are also seeking support measures through measures such as innovative financial services designation, but given the nature of AI technology that evolves day by day, a technology's shelf life can expire during the several months of document screening and review. The regrettable situation arises in which, by the time a regulatory exemption is barely obtained, the technology has already lost its competitiveness in the market.

The recent phenomenon in which regulations centered on traditional finance are being expanded and applied to the platform ecosystem is also a point worth examining in depth. Fintech platforms have played a positive role, streamlining the financial distribution structure with innovative technology and broadening consumers' choices. Regulations that do not take such platform characteristics into account can weaken the industry's growth engine and lead to reduced benefits for consumers. Other countries are already achieving visible results by adding "speed" and "autonomy" to existing regulatory easing. The United Kingdom has made its digital sandbox permanent, achieving results that shorten the market entry period for innovative companies by up to more than 30 percent, while Singapore has attracted more than 80 percent of ASEAN fintech investment funds on the basis of a flexible regulatory environment.

The future regulatory paradigm must move more flexibly in line with the changing market environment. While holding firms strictly accountable after the fact, we must substantively advance a "negative regulation" system (allowing in principle, regulating by exception) that lowers regulatory thresholds so that new technologies can first be validated in the market.

Regulatory innovation is by no means about granting privileges to a particular industry or eliminating regulations unconditionally. It means overhauling outdated standards and systems in step with the changes of the times and opening up space "at the right time" where new innovation can breathe. On the foundation of regulatory innovation that the financial authorities have admirably laid, it is time for the government, the National Assembly, and the industry to move with speed as one, so that Korea's fintech industry can soar proudly onto the global stage.

Original reporting by Seoul Economic Daily (Commentary) for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →
5:23

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Chaebol Tree

Preview
Families Behind the GroupsKFTC May 2026 · DART filings

An English-first interactive map of Samsung, SK, Hyundai, LG and Lotte — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts. Korea translates companies into English. We translate the families behind them.

SIGNAL

Pre-register
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

Pre-register for SIGNAL English Edition — a premium subscription bringing Korean capital markets coverage (M&A, IPOs, private equity, fund flows) to global institutional investors. First access to the 50% introductory rate.