KITA Hosts Briefing on US Tariff Refunds, Urges Swift Application

US CBP Launches Refund System Last Month Guidance on Application Procedures and Risk Review Content Verification for Derivatives May Tighten

News|
|
By Jeong Hye-jin
||
Cho Sung-dae, head of the Trade and Commerce Research Department at the Korea International Trade Association, delivers a session presentation at the online briefing on "Responding to U.S. IEEPA Tariff Refunds and Section 232 Tariff Risks" held on the 6th. Photo provided by the Korea International Trade Association - Seoul Economic Daily Finance News from South Korea
Cho Sung-dae, head of the Trade and Commerce Research Department at the Korea International Trade Association, delivers a session presentation at the online briefing on "Responding to U.S. IEEPA Tariff Refunds and Section 232 Tariff Risks" held on the 6th. Photo provided by the Korea International Trade Association

The Korea International Trade Association (KITA) said Tuesday it held an online briefing on "Tariff Refunds Under the US International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and Section 232 Tariff Risk Response."

The briefing was organized to guide exporters on the tariff refund application procedures that the US government launched on April 20 following the court ruling against IEEPA reciprocal tariffs, as well as precautions and recent developments in tariff measures. Approximately 250 officials from exporting companies attended the session.

Cho Sung-dae, head of KITA's Trade Research Department, explained that the 10% tariff imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act, which replaced the reciprocal tariffs, can be levied only for up to 150 days. "Extending the tariff beyond July 24 would require congressional cooperation, but the likelihood is low," Cho said. "The US administration also appears to be pursuing Section 301 of the Trade Act as a contingency."

Kim Tae-joo, executive director at Samjong KPMG, stressed that companies should expedite their refund applications, as the possibility of an administration appeal cannot be ruled out. Kim warned that if errors in country of origin, product classification, or declared prices are found during the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) review process, the refund could be withheld, and could even lead to tariff recovery and penalties. He also provided guidance on practical procedures, including setting up refund accounts.

Shim Jong-sun, a partner at Deloitte Anjin, explained the recently revised method of imposing tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. In the past, derivative products of steel, aluminum, and copper were subject to a complex structure in which Section 232 product tariffs applied to the metal content portion while reciprocal tariffs applied to the non-content portion, fueling continued controversy over customs valuation.

He also emphasized the importance of calculating declared prices and securing supporting documents during the refund application process. "Refunds may be delayed as the metal content value declarations on previously cleared shipments are reviewed together," he said.

Original reporting by Jeong Hye-jin for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Chaebol Tree

Preview
Families Behind the GroupsKFTC May 2026 · DART filings

An English-first interactive map of Samsung, SK, Hyundai, LG and Lotte — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts. Korea translates companies into English. We translate the families behind them.