Breaking News: US Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Dealing Blow to Trump

US Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship 6-3 "After Tariffs, Another Defeat for Trump on Immigration Law" Also Seen as Signaling Resolve to Fight Progressive Forces

International|
|
By Lee Tae-kyu, Washington Correspondent
||
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Correspondent Lee Tae-kyu - Seoul Economic Daily International News from South Korea
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Correspondent Lee Tae-kyu

The US Supreme Court has blocked an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to end "birthright citizenship," the automatic granting of US citizenship to children born in the United States.

The Supreme Court maintained a broad interpretation of birthright citizenship in a 6-3 decision Monday, Reuters reported.

Trump signed the executive order on his first day in office in January last year, banning birthright citizenship for children born to foreign parents who are either in the country illegally or lack permanent residency. Following the order, 22 states led by Democratic governors, along with Washington, D.C., filed lawsuits arguing the order violated the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. The lower courts in the first and second instances ruled it unconstitutional and issued injunctions to halt its effect.

Adopted in 1868, shortly after the Civil War, the 14th Amendment stipulates that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are US citizens. Accordingly, children born in the United States to foreign parents temporarily residing without permanent residency have automatically acquired US citizenship.

The Trump administration had argued that the original purpose of birthright citizenship was to guarantee citizenship to Black slaves and their children immediately after the Civil War, not for wealthy Chinese families engaging in birth tourism or for undocumented residents. In April, Trump became the first sitting president to attend oral arguments before the Supreme Court, lending weight to the administration's position.

Reuters noted that "the Supreme Court dealt Trump a painful defeat with this ruling," calling it "the second case this year to put the brakes on a major policy of the Trump administration." The court had previously ruled in February that reciprocal tariffs were unlawful.

In Washington, some assess that Trump suffered humiliation by losing a case in which he personally went to the Supreme Court to argue. Others interpret it differently, saying that regardless of the outcome, he clearly demonstrated to his support base his resolve to fight against progressive immigration law. Trump made no direct comment immediately after the ruling, and just before the decision he posted on Truth Social a link to an article titled "Trump's attempt to abolish birthright citizenship can succeed regardless of the Supreme Court's ruling."

Original reporting by Lee Tae-kyu, Washington Correspondent for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →
5:23

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Chaebol Tree

Preview
Families Behind the GroupsKFTC May 2026 · DART filings

An English-first interactive map of Samsung, SK, Hyundai, LG and Lotte — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts. Korea translates companies into English. We translate the families behind them.

SIGNAL

Pre-register
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

Pre-register for SIGNAL English Edition — a premium subscription bringing Korean capital markets coverage (M&A, IPOs, private equity, fund flows) to global institutional investors. First access to the 50% introductory rate.