Industry Minister Says Profit-Based Bonuses Not Subject to Labor Disputes

■ Industry Minister Press Briefing "Investors Should Also Be Rewarded"

Finance|
|
By Cho Yoon-jin
||
Industry and Trade Minister Kim Jung-kwan speaks at a press briefing at the Government Complex Sejong on the 22nd. Photo courtesy of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy. - Seoul Economic Daily Finance News from South Korea
Industry and Trade Minister Kim Jung-kwan speaks at a press briefing at the Government Complex Sejong on the 22nd. Photo courtesy of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.

As demands for "performance bonuses equal to N% of operating profit" spread across the labor sector following a bonus dispute between Samsung Electronics and its union, Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan made clear his opposition, saying "it is not appropriate for bonuses to become a subject of labor disputes."

Meeting with reporters at the Government Complex Sejong on Saturday afternoon, Kim said, "From the labor sector's perspective, bonuses are expected to be made an issue in some way, but I see this as a legal gap."

Kim also argued that investors should participate in labor-management discussions on bonuses and that investors should be compensated as well. "Those who contributed to the company's operating profit are not only management and the union; investors should not be overlooked," Kim said. "Moreover, if you look at the back end of operating profit, workers entered with the basic premise of a guaranteed salary, while investors entered prepared to bear losses."

Kim continued, "Because the risks for workers and investors are entirely different, compensation for investors who take risks should clearly be different from that for unions and management." He stressed, "This is ultimately an issue tied not only to current investors but also to domestic and foreign investors who wish to invest in the future."

He added, "Whether through the Commercial Act or the Capital Markets Act, I believe a mechanism from the investor's perspective is needed in some form." Kim said, "Under the current discussion framework, there is no room for investors or shareholders to participate, so institutional improvements in this regard are necessary."

Companies in this story

Original reporting by Cho Yoon-jin for Seoul Economic Daily.

AI-translated from Korean. Quotes from foreign sources are based on Korean-language reports and may not reflect exact original wording.

Watch · Seoul Economic Daily

More →
2:32

AI KEY

Preview
Korean Corporate Intelligence HubKOSPI · KOSDAQ · 12 sectors

A live, cap-weighted view of every KOSPI and KOSDAQ sector, with same-day Korean reporting distilled by company — built for foreign investors, correspondents and analysts who need to scan Korea before the next session.

Korea Company Atlas

Preview
Market Ontology · The Feedback LoopKFTC 2025 · 92 groups · 121,954 articles

An English ontology of the Korean market — how companies, the media, the government and the National Assembly move each other in a loop. Korea's named controlling persons and designated business groups are a mechanism, not a risk to be priced blind.

SIGNAL

Pre-register
English Edition · Capital MarketsM&A · IPO · PE · Fund Flows

Pre-register for SIGNAL English Edition — a premium subscription bringing Korean capital markets coverage (M&A, IPOs, private equity, fund flows) to global institutional investors. First access to the 50% introductory rate.